V. Analysis
<<
>>
V. Analysis
Autoethnographic Narratives | Published Narratives | Interview Narratives
Published Narratives
The following figures map the relationship between people as invention influences and specific changes in webtext drafts. The published narratives used to generate these analyses were selected from Kairos Journal's Inventio section.
Boyd, "Pulling the Difference"
Descriptive Summary
A: Madeleine commented that she likes the new introduction and reflects on how the revised project will enact Boyd’s argument.
B: Madeleine commented that the editors liked a particular section.
C: Madeleine and Boyd worked together to make sense of how to create an organic design.
- Collaborator | Inform | Total
D: Madeleine is concerned about screen real estate and offers suggestions.
- Collaborator | Suggest | Base
E: Madeleine is concerned about screen real estate and offers suggestions.
- Collaborator | Suggest | Base
F: Madeleine offers encouragement for finding a solution and emphasizes the project’s fit for Inventio.
G: Boyd asked/considered asking her students to write reflections and take pictures of their research for inclusion in the project.
- Students | Give | Text + Media
H: Madeleine’s web design closely complemented Boyd’s written argument.
- Collaborator | Give | Base
I: Madeleine and Boyd’s discussions generated themes that became important design metaphors.
- Collaborator | Inform | Splash
J: Boyd and Madeleine express approval of the design while referencing Cheryl’s approval.
- Collaborator | Motivate | Splash
Delagrange, "Wunderkammer, Cornell, and the Visual Canon of Arrangement"
Descriptive Summary
A: The project’s initial form was a paper with PowerPoint slides presented at CCCC.
- Colleague | Motivate | Text + Media
B: Cheryl Ball and Beth Hewett were interested in the piece but recommended that she revise and resubmit.
- Editor | Re-Envision | Total
C: The editors and reviewers offered suggestions for rethinking Delagrange’s interface.
D: The editors invited Delagrange to “re-envision” the piece, which she took up as a challenge.
- Editor | Motivate | Total
E: A reviewer offered a suggestion to use screen real estate differently and challenged Delagrange to account for her decision.
F: A reviewer suggested making the subsection navigation more informative, which inspired Delagrange to add more wayposting.
- Editor | Suggest | Navigation
G: Delagrange was invited by the OSU Digital Union to present her work in a “charrette” for interdisciplinary faculty.
- Colleague | Inform | Navigation
H: Kairos reviewers, including editors Cheryl Ball and Beth Hewett, expressed concern over the ambiguous relationship between images and text.
- Editor | Suggest | Text + Media
I: Joe Bondra of Ohio State’s Digital Union helped Delagrange work with Actionscript.
- Consultant | Inform | Code
J: Karl Stolley of Kairos helped Delagrange translate part of Wunderkammer into XML for search engine purposes.
- Consultant | Inform | Code
K: In her “Acknowledgements”, Delagrange credits Sorapure for careful reading and suggestions.
L: Ball, Ulman, and McCorkle offered encouragement and feedback following musings at Watson Conference.
- Colleague | Motivate | Total
M: Delagrange thanked Krause for permission to use his animation of Gilbert Austin’s figures.
Lauer, "What's in a Name?"
Descriptive Summary
A: A friend who knew Illustrator helped her put the elements together on the screen for the first iteration of the interface design.
- Consultant | Inform | Media
B: Lauer was not fully satisfied with the results of her friend’s work but had to go with it.
- Consultant | Halt | Media
C: Madeleine Sorapure helped Lauer transition the project from Prezi to Flash.
- Editor | Re-Envision | Total
D: A student helped Lauer transition the project from Flash to HTML/CSS.
- Student | Re-Envision | Total
E: The student provided the initial structure for the project’s foundation.
F: The student provided ongoing technological expertise.
<<
>>
